One of the biggest and most harmful lies in the history written by the French (the Franks), in addition to that of the history of Islam and the creation of an Arab people, is that of the so-called barbaric vandal  who destroyed the Roman civilization, while simultaneously invading North Africa.
The vandals and the other Germanic tribes were not armed tribes breaking on Rome at the speed of the hatchet – far from it.
The alleged vandals and their allies were refugees, alike in misery to refugees we see today from Africa and Asia, whom Europe will somehow use to preserve the benefits of the empowered. These people are without weapons or luggage, unable to attack even the weakest armies.
These Germanic tribes were no bitter enemies of Rome. In fact the romans, they saw the possibility of saving the then-decadent Rome by using barbarians as gendarmes of the empire. They became so well integrated with the Roman empire that Rome made them the military elite of the empire. Contrary to what history says,It was in converting to Arianism that the vandals had invaded North Africa and restored or imposed this branch of Christianity on the Catholic populations of Berber.

It was from this lie that another so-called Arab invasion of North Africa and the Iberian Peninsula was later built. The reason remains to be found in the rubble of these stories.
These stories of vandal and then Arab invasions must be completely rewritten, that we may understand the evolution of humanity and be ready to prevent these mistakes that once cost us dearly in the past.

According to the official history of Islam written by Catholic and Muslim fanatics, the Sarazens were those who were cited as the conquerors who spread the Islamic faith in the 700 hundreds. A faith whose sacred book would only exist a century later.
It seems that the Europeans took ingredients they had at home and made a great story for Islam. Let’s see whom the sarazins were in the middle ages.

In his book “The Sarazins were from the area” (Les Sarazins étaient du coin), the French historian Joseph Henriet demonstrates that those whom history has named Sarazens were not Arabs. They would be, more generally, pagans, peoples who had not converted to Christianity, and assimilated to Muslims by a confusion due to the idea, formerly believed, that Islam adapted certain traits estimated prior to Christianity. Heresy was generally regarded as a superficial garment given to old beliefs; this was also the case of Arianism, which had been adopted by the Burgundians. In the heart of the Alps, according to Henriet, different heretics and pagans could live side by side, but at the end of the day, they were no stranger to the area: it was a native people, settled in places since the beginning. They are those whom we today call Ligures, whose language was no doubt close to Basque. In opposite from the Allobroges, they remained at the top of the mountains or in the depths of the valleys.

According to Henriet, the description of “Sarazins” by medieval authors refers to indigenous peoples, not Eastern invaders.
These natives would have preserved for a long time, in the Middle Ages, their pagan cults, their way of mountainlife, and also their habits of plundering the convoys of travelers when their productions were insufficient. Christian writers, living in the cities, would therefore have claimed them to be “Sarazins”, referring both to the terror they inspired, and to their ignorance of the Christian religion.

One day, perhaps soon, thanks to the rapid progress of genetic sience, honorable scientists should be able to determine with certainty whom the Sarazins of the Alps were. In the meantime, Joseph Henriet’s hypothesis seems to be particularly convincing …

David is the leader of the liberation of the hebrew people movement. He is also a Hebrew scholar who is an independent researcher. He works, in his own words, on the foundations of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam and their relationship to different contemporary political ideologies. He has also directed several documentary films and written fiction screenplays, some of which have been awarded.

nomadic-arabe-mongol-tuareg-1
The word “Arabic” is not a word in Arabic. The etymological origin of the word “Arab” comes from Hebrew and refers exclusively to a socio-economic behavior related to living in an arid region, nomadizing, subsisting rapines, incursions and raids in order to seize the goods and resources of sedentary villagers. It can therefore be applied regardless of ethnic origin. Since then, the meaning of this term has evolved to mean an idiom and has recently been transformed into a pseudo-ethnic term for the care of Pan-Arab propaganda. In the Qur’an alone, the linguistic connotation is retained: “the Arabic language” … ”

There is not and there has never been an “Arab people” (Fr)

I am persuaded that repeating infinitely the fables written by the Muslims, we are only legitimizing and fortifying a lie that has already done a lot of damage. It is time to say no to the falsification of the history of Islam, to say no we do not believe that ignorant bedouins had castles in a megacity located in the Arabian desert.

The character of Muhammad, as described by the Islamic tradition, never existed. If he had existed, he would not have survived a week in Medina. This city probably did not exist either. No non-Islamic writing of the time, no vestige, no direct testimony, attests of his existence. Everything was invented during the centuries, probably after Othmane and Hajjaj.

In the seventh century, writing was widespread in the region. In Aramaic, in Greek, in Syriac …. but no writing in Arabic has been transmitted. Arabic probably did not exist. The Quran that we know has been knitted from the 10th century. The character of Muhammad the prophet, with all the acts and words attributed to him was invented from all parts, little by little.

For centuries, the Quran was not written. If I was Allah, I would not confederate my word to illiterate people, rude and rough, and having no means to write and perpetuate my word without giving rise to dissension, disagreement and chism. The first 22 caliphs were assassinated and the fratricidal war between Muslims marked the whole history of Islam.
Islam is really a trickery.

This religion took much less precautions than the other deceptions: Judaism and Christianity. Islam spreads through constraint, force and violence. It took no precautions to make themselves consistent and convincing….

1400 years ago, the Talmudic Rabbis of the Pharisees raised Islam to become their spearhead for fighting Christianity and “chilling the Christian.”
But their deformed baby grew up and such as Frankenstein’s “Golem” became a monster who turned against his Judeo-Rabbinic parents and began “eating the Jew.”
Today, the Talmudic rabbis of the Pharisees still believe that they can manipulate Islam once again to become their Golem, destined to crush Christianity!
These venomous rabbis, whose hatred against Christianity is matched only by debility, have still not understood that after eating a Christian, the Muslim ogre will eat the Jew!
To be convinced of the harmfulness of these rabbis, just view this video.
Warning ! This execrable fanatical rabbi is certainly representative of the Pharisaic Talmudic theology that alienated the Jewish communities, but he is hated in Israel by the Hebrews and the Jewish Israelites. Please do not mix up these jihadi rabbis with the Hebrew people!

The rabbi of this video threatens Europe with merciless slaughter by their Muslim soldiers

Non c'est lui pic.twitter.com/EKEkYFP7iX

— l'oeil de lynx (@l_oeil_du_lynx) August 23, 2017